Tuesday, December 08, 2020

A Vision of the Future

In the not too distant future our world will look very different from today.  Because of imminent and significant technological innovations in computers, machine intelligence, biotechnology and robotics, there will be considerably less need for human labor.  Universal adoption of cheap home fabrication technologies (such as 3-D printers) will remove the need to centrally manufacture or buy consumer items – if you can imagine it, you can build it, for little more than the cost of the base raw materials.  These changes will be enabled and enhanced by breakthroughs in power generation, transmission and storage, making energy plentiful, clean and effectively free.  All this will change the very fabric of society as we know it in the biggest sea change since the industrial revolution.

Such quantum changes always cause considerable 'creative destruction' as old technologies, practices, institutions and ideas are overtaken by new, more powerful and more relevant ones.  But this also creates opportunities to radically and fundamentally move society towards any one of a multitude of different outcomes.  The direction in which our society changes depends entirely on us; in particular our collective desire to direct those changes for the benefit of the many, not just the few.

In the 18th Century the Industrial Revolution spawned a series of huge economic and social changes; in the rising industrial nations over several decades it drove the largest-ever increase in living standards in their history.  However it also caused mass migrations from rural areas to cities, exploitation of labor and the environment, the advent of workhouses and robber barons, and extremes of immense wealth and abject poverty.  Similarly, this coming technological and social revolution could in its worst manifestation cause large-scale unemployment and poverty, huge wealth inequalities, global environmental destruction, mass extinctions of animal and plant species, and widespread misery, starvation and death for many human beings.

The power to avoid this fate and create a better outcome lies in our hands; however the alternative paths are not easy and will require enormous collective will.  A combination of natural societal entropy and inertia and the entrenched nature of our established power systems and institutions, coupled with the more selfish aspects of human nature are highly likely (without additional impetus) to drive us almost inevitably to a disturbingly inharmonious and imbalanced future that may take generations to correct – much as happened with the Industrial Revolution.

This negative future vision is certainly not inescapable, though it certainly won’t be trivial to avoid.  Even if we envision an alternative, more idealized society which these changes  might create, making such a transformation happen will take concerted and deliberate action.  However we must first suspend any cynical assumptions of the inevitability of human greed and selfishness; not to ignore them and cling to an unrealistic utopian vision of an unattainable paradise, but to allow us to offer a clear and contrasting alternative to the dystopian society that would otherwise surely arise.

In this essay I describe one such alternative future vision which is not only entirely possible, but for the vast mass of humanity would be highly desirable and preferable to both their current living situation and many likely future ones.  Through clearly articulating and understanding the range of future possibilities and the probable long-term outcomes of the choices we are currently facing, collectively we can make those choices intentionally and intelligently to harness the benefits of the coming changes and shape a far better world for everyone.  If we wish to create a better, more balanced and more egalitarian society we must quickly seize the opportunity that these changes are offering us before their outcomes are inevitable; the time for collective action to actively determine our future course is now.


Human labor

Because of vast increase in the efficiencies of mechanized labor, the means of production (including food production) will become largely automated and self-contained, requiring little or even no human intervention.  Whole industries, including agriculture, manufacturing, mining, transportation, clerical work and many others will become largely or completely automated.  Others, such as medicine or engineering will change beyond all recognition, requiring humans only to provide some necessary advanced technical or personal services that machines cannot (or should not) provide.  Some industries (such as advertising or banking) will become redundant and pretty much disappear completely.

It's likely that human effort will still be needed, at least for the foreseeable future – e.g. for decision-making, for advanced research and innovation, or for designing and engineering complex machines, androids and robotic systems (and the machines that build, manage and repair them).  All creative endeavors, including the arts, will still be dominated by humans – although computer-generated art, literature, music and design will become commonplace (and sometimes even indistinguishable from their human-created equivalents).  Because most people will not work full time, any tasks requiring regular or constant human attention will be shared among multiple individuals, in a way similar to job sharing today.

As one example, just imagine a simple visit to the dentist in this hypothetical future society.  You tell your intelligent personal assistant (an android) that you need to see a dentist, and it contacts your nearest medical center to schedule it.  If there's a treatment bay currently available a driverless car will arrive at your house within minutes and you'll be transported there.  On arrival, a realistic humanoid android will greet you warmly (in your preferred language) and escort you to your treatment bay, where a medical droid will examine you, referring to your existing dental and medical records and cross-referencing a vast intelligent repository of medical knowledge about your condition, and perform (almost painlessly and discomfort-free) whatever dental treatment you need.  You'll then be supplied any required medications and driven back home by another car.  In most such situations, no other humans need be involved.


What will people do?

Human beings are creatures of habit.  We are, to a large extent, indoctrinated by our upbringing and educational system to conform to a narrow band of expectations and activities which are most likely to make us productive and successful members of a highly mechanized and industrialized society.  Out of necessity and habit we typically get up every day to work to feed ourselves and our families, and rarely give a thought to the purpose of it all or what the alternatives might be.

But what if such work is no longer required of us or valuable to society – what will we do?  Because of the coming wave of technological advances, the concept of work as we know it today will largely disappear.  This could be viewed negatively, but in this scenario it will be a blessing and a huge liberation for humankind.  No longer will humans be required to spend most of their waking hours laboring simply to survive and thrive, wasting their bodies or their minds in pointless drudgery.  Instead, everyone will be supplied with most or all their lower-order Maslow's needs – safety, shelter, food, water, comfort, healthcare, education, information, entertainment, basic transportation, and more.  This will free up the greatest minds of the human race to apply their most valuable skill – their intelligence – to questions of a higher order.

Citizens may still provide labor to fulfill the few manual tasks that are still necessary – which will also engender a sense of connection to the community and its shared resources.  All able-bodied adult citizens will satisfy a minimum community service requirement each month, such tasks being "priced" according to the level of skill or training required and the degree of demand vs. supply (so the most highly skilled or least popular tasks will require the least number of service hours.)  Either way, most citizens will only be required to work a few hours each month, leaving them (by our standards) a large amount of leisure time, to be devoted to their chosen vocation, ongoing education, entertainment, creative endeavors or recreation as they desire.

Of course, some people will naturally choose to use their leisure time pursuing careers in areas (such as engineering, design, science, craftsmanship or the arts) where they are particularly talented or that strongly interest them.  People that choose to send their time exclusively on "unproductive" activities (as defined by their communities) will live in relative comfort but not thrive – unless they choose to also spend some of their time providing value to their communities.


Money and value

So how will "value" be defined in this society?  When labor is no longer the primary driver of most people's worth, money as we know it will eventually and quite naturally disappear.  The value of each citizen (and their opportunity to better themselves and improve their circumstances) will instead be through a crowdsourced system of appreciation.  What you choose to produce in your free time for the benefit of the community will be valued in the form of "Pax" – almost like an electronic tipping system, very similar to likes or recommends on social media today.  If you produce something useful or valuable to others in any way (such as an informative news article, a beautiful photograph, or an innovative new product), or if you invest time in something that others want (e.g. a service or event), you'll be very likely to receive more Pax from others.

In some ways Pax is similar to money, but its purpose is very different; people offer their time, wisdom creativity or expertise to a community and the community values it accordingly, using Pax to show their appreciation.  Each person can give anyone else one Pax for a single specific contribution if they wish, but otherwise there is no limit of how much Pax each person can give to others (as with Social Media likes).  Giving someone Pax costs you nothing but a moment of your time, and one gift of Pax is by itself largely insignificant.  But many people giving someone Pax for their contribution is a form of mass appreciation, so if you consistently receive Pax by providing something of value to others, your status within the community over time will naturally increase.  The amount of your accumulated Pax is always publicly visible online, and as you accumulate more of it you can expect and request benefits from the community in return – e.g. by moving to a nicer home or taking a pleasant vacation – depending what the community has to offer and what you want or need.

Politics and many leadership roles will still be needed, although without the pervasive influence of money, power will not be so highly concentrated in the hands of a few people (reducing incentives towards corruption and favoritism).  In general, individuals with more Pax will be more respected and so may naturally gravitate towards leadership positions (or be encouraged to by their communities).

Humans will still need to make all the important decisions about how society is managed and organized, and  major community decisions (including elections) will be democratic, based on instant electronic voting, so that such decisions will always reflect the wishes of the individual communities.  Laws will be automatically and neutrally enforced by android police, but many of the laws we have today around property, money and power will be irrelevant and no longer exist.  Only actions which explicitly harm another person or their property (or the community's) will be illegal.  Although laws will be administered and enforced by androids, all legislation, judgments and punishments will be decided by humans.


Community

The concept of community becomes vitally important when everyone is interdependent, not for their basic human needs, but for their social, emotional and intellectual connection to others.  So the concept of "community" extends beyond local geographical communities (primarily your local city or county), to extended communities across the world who share cultural, social, religious or other beliefs, practices and values.  The Internet already makes it easy to find others to connect with, no matter where you live or what you like to do.  So for example imagine if you'd written a book – in a worldwide population of billions, you only need perhaps a few thousand people to read it, enjoy it, and give you some Pax for it to be of 'value' to the community and for you to get some tangible benefit from writing it (and perhaps the incentive to continue writing).

In this society the profit motive which drives capitalism also disappears.  The currently accepted norm of creating a product or service, convincing others that they "need" it, then extracting an inflated value premium from providing it (by artificially protecting intellectual capital, exploiting raw materials or labor at below their intrinsic worth, ignoring externalized costs or charging excess rents on resources) becomes pointless, and will be judged negatively by the community.  As individuals have their basic needs met and can make the everyday products they actually use effectively for free, there's no longer any consumers, and so no reason for a "business" to make and sell goods and services in the traditional sense.  Innovation is still useful, valued and rewarded, but the motive instead becomes contributing to the community (and receiving appreciation in return, via Pax).

Communities will be infinitely flexible.  Any two people could create a community for any purpose, and communities could be created online for particular projects or goals.  In this way individuals could collectively start a "business" (or more accurately, a collective) to create anything that they believe would have value to the community.  With no need for complex legal requirements or startup capital, any community can create anything they can collectively dream up, if it has enough perceived value to attract the talented people it needs to fulfill its mission.

For example, suppose you devised a brilliant new technology to allow cleaning bots to clean cars much more efficiently.  You might create a design proposal for this technology, and publish it to a community of engineering experts (either locally or around the world) who would review it, recognize its value, perhaps make suggestions to improve it, then help you prototype and test it.  Once its value was proven and deployed locally or worldwide, both you and your communities would then receive lots of Pax from many other communities and individuals for your ingenuity and effort.  In this way, many of the incentives of capitalism to innovate and disseminate new ideas still exist, without the selfishness, exploitation, redundancy, monopolistic behaviors and externalized costs that are endemic today.  We're already seeing the beginnings of such changes with the advent of the Internet, open source movements and socially-oriented businesses (such as Wikipedia or Craigslist).

There will also be a reduced value placed on personal property.  Individuals will still own the personal items they need or want, but as consumer goods are effectively free and most resources are shared and managed by communities, people will come to value both practical and aesthetic contributions – such as hand-crafted personalized items – much more than just mass-produced 'things'.  Everyone will still have a standard of living commensurate with their value to their community (as measured in Pax), so there will still be some personal material success to aspire to.  But such success can only come with increasing age and by contributing to your communities, not by focusing on personal gain.

A corollary to this is that marketing and selling will also become largely redundant.  Much as with an Internet search engine today, expressing your needs and desires to your intelligent personal assistant allows them to immediately offer you a variety of suitable choices from around the world, then quickly deliver or manufacture your selection on demand (you can still search or browse the whole world online for odd or unusual items, or design them yourself and receive Pax for your innovation!)  In this paradigm the emphasis is placed on "buyers" searching for the things they want, rather than "sellers" persuading you to buy what they have (this is already happening today with the Internet).  As a result, advertising will become irrelevant and the value of anything will be determined solely by the appreciation of different communities and individuals.


Wider social implications

This focus on community, along with the efficiencies of automated food production, will vastly reduce or even effectively eliminate hunger and poverty worldwide.  Scientific advances will make many diseases preventable or eminently curable, and any damaged or diseased body parts will be replaceable due to advances in bioengineering.  Humans won't be immortal – accidents and old age can still bring death – but we'll be able to live longer, healthier and more fulfilling lives than ever before.

In addition, because the disciplines of science and research are by their very nature collaborative efforts, this new paradigm of communities is perfectly suited to advancing our scientific understanding.  As the foundation of technological innovation, scientific progress will also continue improving people's lives in many of the ways that it has already done over the last few centuries.  With the focus on community and collaboration such progress will also naturally become more sustainable – rather than exploiting people and natural resources, humans will integrate with ecosystems in a much more balanced way.  Instead of accelerating growth and competition leading to a constant spiral of increasing consumption, the symbiotic relationship between people in disparate communities around the world will spur a similar relationship with our environment.

Finally, the vast improvements in education, connection and community across geographical, linguistic and cultural borders will naturally create personal connections, understanding, and ultimately empathy and compassion for others in different circumstances.  The existing factions (geographic, political, cultural, racial and religious) which have traditionally divided us will no longer be seen as significant or important; it's much harder to hate or dismiss someone when you share common experiences with them and understand their worldview.  Eventually wars and violent conflict will come to be seen as pointless and destructive anachronisms from a dysfunctional phase of our evolution as a species.


The future

The society described here is collaborative, supportive and community-oriented, and less hierarchical, selfish, competitive and exploitative than our present one.  It's a culture that's more balanced between feminine and masculine energies than masculine-dominated (consider, for example, the essential qualities we typically demand of our leaders today and how that might shift in this new world).  It's a society in which humanity's natural tendencies of kindness and consideration, tolerance and trust, innovation and creativity, and cooperation and connection are equally or more highly valued and emphasized than those of strength, aggressiveness, drive and decisiveness – much as in most traditional tribal cultures (or intelligent animal cultures) but in a modern technological, highly industrialized and mechanized global context.

Our world is already moving inexorably towards many of these changes, whether we like them or not.  However we can (and must) decide whether the resulting world we create will sustainably support the ideals and values we desire, or if it will become a corrupt, post-capitalist dystopia of exploitation, violence and destruction.  Inaction is itself a choice, so we must act soon.  We have the power to choose.  Let us choose wisely.

Friday, November 22, 2019

What comes after Capitalism?


Capitalism is broken, of that I am now certain.  So what do we do, how can we fix it?  I don’t have all the answers by any means, I mostly have questions.  But here are some of those questions and my thoughts around them.

Capitalism is all about money (capital) which throughout history has equaled power.  We’re all slaves (in some form) to that power.  If freedom is the absence of anyone/anything having power over you, then freedom is a direct product of power.

The essential shibboleth of Capitalism is that money (i.e. the market) will fulfill all needs.  The deceit of this idea is that it will not fulfill them all equally, and for many (most) it comes at a huge price – their labor, their freedom, and even, sometimes, their lives.

Capitalism has singularly failed, decaying from within (as Marx predicted) by its own excesses.  The flow of money/power to those at the top has corrupted the very fabric of governments which supported it.  The hidden externalization of the costs of Capitalism has created a juggernaut of consequences – most obviously the Global Climate Crisis – which it (and therefore we) cannot avoid.  Absent an actual, physical revolution (which I don’t advocate) nothing will derail Capitalism from its current course and ultimate collapse.

The key problem as I see it is not just money, but how we use it as a reward.  The desire for money, and what it brings (power) has consistently overridden rational public policy, scientific evidence, and even ethical behaviors, to the extent that doing evil is richly rewarded (examples of sociopathic CEOs, politicians, etc. abound).

So love of money really *is* the root of all evil – it drives a profound ethical corruption, so that as a culture we waste much of our brief existences for it, and have willingly sacrificed millions (likely billions) of lives and potentially even the whole planet for a slightly nicer house in the suburbs.

Remove money, and many of these problems simply would not occur.  People would not be encouraged to act unethically by being so richly rewarded for it.

That idea is so ridiculous, so simplistic, so unimaginable, that I’m increasingly becoming clear that it is a key part of any solution.  Whatever comes after Capitalism, money as we know it today, will – must – inevitably disappear.

So if money is gone, what would replace it?  I don’t know for sure, but I have some ideas.  Human nature to always strive for more; it’s why I’m typing these words right now and sending them out to people all over the planet – both why I want to do so, and why such technologies even exist.  That part of us still needs to be fed.  However, it doesn’t need to be at the price we’re currently paying for it.  I truly believe the motive force behind Capitalism, the essential quality of human striving and ingenuity, will be (and already is being) unleashed in service to solving that problem.

Even if replacing money is possible, how could we ever get there?  Aren’t the entrenched monetary interests (corporations, politicians, billionaires, etc.) going to resist any substantive change?  Of course they are.  The break point, I believe, is Climate Crisis.

There’s a scene in “Titanic”, where a rich guy tries to bribe his way onto a lifeboat taking women and children off the ship.  The ship’s officer basically tells him to shove it, as money isn’t worth anything to him – he knows he will very likely die that night.  This is where we are now as a planet.  Money will not save us (other than a few billionaires buying bunkers in New Zealand and funding private space programs to ensure they and their children will have their own lifeboats), and most of us are going down with the ship.  Once the mass of people realize this is their fate, I suspect it will get very ugly, very fast.

I believe there is actually hope in the social changes currently underway.  What happens if, for example, AI, robots and automation destroy 10% or 20% of today’s human jobs?  What if it’s 30%?  Or 50%, or 80%?  What will that do to the social fabric, to the political landscape, to Capitalism itself?  My hope is that such changes will force us to rethink our system or even abandon it before Climate Crisis forces our hand.  Maybe we’ll steam a little slower towards that iceberg and maybe it won’t sink us?

The crux of it is that some kind of a revolution is going to be necessary and inevitable to dislodge the power structures which are holding the current systems tightly in place.  As those systems start to break down, the response by the owners of those power structures will determine when and where that revolution will occur, and ultimately whether it will be bloodless (or not).  If they act responsibly and ethically and with a greater vision than just their own "enlightened self-interest", we may be able to transition to another form of society – perhaps even one not totally unrecognizable from today’s – in enough time to avoid hitting the iceberg at all.

x

Tuesday, February 19, 2019

The Qualities of a Likely Democratic Voter


I'm not a big fan of labels – "liberal", "progressive", "leftist", "socialist", "democratic socialist", etc.  People can (and often do disagree) about the definitions and application of these labels.  Worse, people with bad intentions can twist and demonize them, and use them to discredit good people and policies.  Much more interesting to me are the qualities someone espouses (aka "values").

For the purposes of this post I'm going to assume that all the above labels are shades (albeit sometimes valuable distinctions) of the same thing:  Someone who is philosophically opposed to Trump and Republicans in general, and is highly likely to vote for a Democrat.

Let's call these people Likely Democratic Voters (LDV).

So if you care about & advocate for:

– Helping people other than you & yours, you might be an LDV.
– People who have been historically oppressed/disenfranchised, you might be an LDV.
– Addressing the imminent threat to the future of humans on this planet, you might be an LDV.
– Addressing extremes of wealth inequality, you might be an LDV.
– Minimizing the suffering, pain and death of others, you might be an LDV.

etc., etc.

To me, the key qualities which I believe make up an LDV (in some proportion) are empathy, fairness, caring, an open mind, kindness, and a belief in the human spirit.  Most of these qualities have at some point been publicly demonized and/or ridiculed by Republicans.

Empathy is an interesting one for me – I've noticed its absence in all the Republicans I know personally.  I also think it's a key component in good comedy – which is probably why there are no good Republican comedians.

I honestly believe that the American public rewards politicians who have strong qualities/values and who stand by them (even when they don't completely agree with them), someone who "walks the talk".  Policies are important too, but more often because they are a concrete way for politicians to express those values.  This is something that Republicans have intuitively understood for a long time (hence the fabled "values voter").

Perhaps we should look for these qualities & values in candidates, and how they manifest in their policies and the emphasis they place on them – instead of just labeling the candidates like commodities and losing the qualities and values which make them unique – and electable.

Saturday, January 27, 2007

The Real Reason Behind “The Surge”…

For a couple of weeks I’ve been trying to understand why “The Surge”? What possible motivation could the Bush administration have behind defying all logic and reason, not to mention all the good advice from his former Secretary of State, many of his generals, over a thousand serving troops, James Baker and Friends, and numerous opinion polls? I now think I have an answer.

However, to understand it, you have to shift your mindset to the dark, cold, twisted and contorted world of the Bushites. Follow me if you dare…

The first shift you have to make is from an intelligent, progressive person into the Bush mindset. This may be hard for you. Remove any thought of doing the right thing for the country or the troops from your mind, and instead focus on your overriding goals: The creation and preservation of power and wealth for yourself and those that support you unquestioningly. Secondly assume that everything you say and everything that the acolytes around you will repeat endlessly creates it’s own reality. Truth isn’t the point, it’s the impressions which get created that count. Everything you do or say has a political goal − to create and shape the reality of the world that everyone else perceives.

If you’re able to think through this lens, the goal of “The Surge” becomes clear. The Iraq war is of course a way to harness mindless patriotism in support of the country's leaders, and as a reward to your pals in the corporate military industrial complex who fund and sustain your power. Thus, also, “winning” in Iraq is no longer even relevant, except as a rhetorical device for public consumption − that’s the next guy’s problem. No, the goal of “The Surge” is to distract attention from the fact that the US is actually losing the war. Notice that in the last few months the public media discussion has largely turned from subjects like “investigate the lies which led to war” and “get the troops out or Iraq now” to “how many troops do we need to surge with” and “how long do we need for the surge to be successful”. The public may be overwhelmingly behind withdrawal from Iraq; Congressional investigation into the war may or may not happen. But these subjects aren’t even being discussed by the media at large, so the American Public has been successfully distracted. Mission Accomplished (for now, at least).

Perhaps the biggest mistake that many people if this country have made over the last few years is to imagine that the President and his advisors are genuinely trying to do the right thing, and that sometimes they just get it wrong. Yes, they know that politicians are apt to lie just to get elected, but there’s a sort of naïve optimism that assumes once they are elected they genuinely try to make things better, and that sometimes they may actually succeed (if only by accident). While I believe that’s true of some leaders (FDR comes to mind), the evidence of the last few years is overwhelming that it’s in no way true of this administration − it’s not that they’re trying to damage the country, it’s that they simply couldn’t care less. It’s just not in their mindset to help anyone but themselves and those like them. Of course, there are some thin intellectual justifications for all this, mostly from the Straussian Neocons such as Perle or Kristol, but in reality it’s just naked greed for power, wealth, and the preservation of their own kind.

Of course, some of us know all this, but the rest of the country has just started to wake up and make the shift. Help them. Show them. Be nice to them, they’re good people, and just as they could never think this way, it just never occurred to them that their own President could either.

~ Trendar.

Thursday, October 12, 2006

Why you should vote Republican

Redstate.com had a competition to come up with the best list of reasons to vote Republican. The winner:

I will vote Republican in 2006 because:

1. I want a prosperous America, where the poorest can achieve wealth, if allowed to save instead of pay high taxes, while benefiting from low unemployment and limited regulation.

2. I want a freer America, where my rights-- to own a gun, to determine my own healthcare arrangements-- are not infringed in the pursuit of an abstract common good.

3. I want a strong America-- one that does not cower when threatened by its enemies, which defends its interests, and exists as a beacon of hope to all who wish to be free.

Where to start, where to start... A prize to whoever comes up with the best smackdown of this unbridled bullshit.

~ Trendar.

Wednesday, August 02, 2006

CT-Senate: A Prediction

Challenger Ned Lamont will, in fact, win the Connecticut Democrat Senate Primary next Tuesday by a large margin. Furthermore, the incumbent Senator Joe Lieberman will not then run as an independent candidate, because he'll fail to collect and submit enough signatures to do so by the Wednesday deadline. The controversy will continue as Joe first tries to circumvent the election rules and finally, in a fit of pique, runs an abortive write-in campaign.

Ned Lamont will be the next Junior Senator from Connecticut.

~ Trendar.

Thursday, July 06, 2006

Conservatives Who Hate America

The ACLU is an organization devoted to just one thing - preserving and maintaining the U.S. constitution:
We work daily in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States.
The constitution is a unique document which defines the United States legal system and makes the United States a beacon of freedom and justice throughout the World. So the ACLU, whose sole purpose is to defend and enforce that constitution is therefore... an evil organization which must be stopped at all costs?

Or a noble and principled organization that promotes the constitutional values which have made America great?

You decide.

So if many conservatives hate the ACLU so much for defending our constitution, then does that mean that those conservatives also hate America?

~ Trendar

Lay Cheats Us One Last Time

Ken Lay, the corrupt (and convicted) former Chairman of Enron will, in death, not only avoid hard jail time, but he will also cheat his debtors (presumably including the former employees and shareholders of Enron) out of the $43.5 million that prosecutors were attempting to recover from his personal estate. Because his conviction was technically pending appeal, it will now be "extinguished", and his estate will be protected from any further attempt to recover the money.

Although the civil suits against him can proceed, The Oracle predicts that not one penny will ever be recovered from the tortuous complexities and financial mazes that comprise his personal estate.

Wild conspiracy theories aside, it nonetheless does seem a remarkably fortunate outcome for his heirs that he should die at this time.
Enron watchers everywhere will be awaiting the outcome of the post mortem and the toxicology tests (due in a few weeks) with great interest.

The only good news in all this is that even though he cheated both the legal system and hard jail time, as corrupt a man as he could not cheat death, and he will now get to experience whatever is coming to the special corner of hell that's reserved just for people like him.

~ Trendar

Wednesday, June 28, 2006

Robin Hood in Reverse

Many US companies are stealing from the poor, the middle class, and just about everyone else, to give to the rich...

This is the pension squeeze companies aren't talking about: Even as many reduce, freeze or eliminate pensions for workers -- complaining of the costs -- their executives are building up ever-bigger pensions, causing the companies' financial obligations for them to balloon.

Companies disclose little about any of this. But a Wall Street Journal analysis of corporate filings reveals that executive benefits are playing a large and hidden role in the declining health of America's pensions.

If you work for a major US corporation (GM, Pfizer, B of A, the list goes on), it's quite likely that your own pension is being raided to pay for the company's executive pensions.

If you own stock in a major US corporation, it's quite likely that your stock is undervalued because that corporation's profitability is suffering to pay its executive's pensions.

Even if you you're just an ordinary working stiff, then the US economy is suffering (impacting all of us) and the government's tax base is being eroded (contributing to the deficit which you're paying for with your taxes) because major US corporations are screwing everyone to pay for their executive pensions.

Robin Hood, where are you when we need you?

~ Trendar

Tuesday, June 27, 2006

First They Came for the Journalists...

If we allow the government to attack the press simply for publishing the truth, we enable suppression of free speech. By refusing to resist them, we encourage them to continue their path inexorably towards totalitarianism. The press is the first domino in the sequence to that end. They are already cowed and cowardly (or worse, complicit). Once the government has silenced the press, the internet and the blogs will inevitably be next. If we aren't willing to lie down in front of this slowly, inexorably advancing tank, individually or collectively, we will be crushed anyway. We must speak out now, while we still can.

"A man who won’t die for something is not fit to live." - Martin Luther King, Jr.

~ Trendar